<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publish2 peddling old thinking as new journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bronwenclune.com/2008/04/01/publish2-peddling-old-thinking-as-new-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bronwenclune.com/2008/04/01/publish2-peddling-old-thinking-as-new-journalism/</link>
	<description>There is life after control media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 07:44:57 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.bronwenclune.com/2008/04/01/publish2-peddling-old-thinking-as-new-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 11:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronwenclune.com/2008/04/01/publish2-peddling-old-thinking-as-new-journalism/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for taking back control from algorithms, but amateurs is a bit rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for taking back control from algorithms, but amateurs is a bit rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.bronwenclune.com/2008/04/01/publish2-peddling-old-thinking-as-new-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronwenclune.com/2008/04/01/publish2-peddling-old-thinking-as-new-journalism/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Do they realise that they _can&#039;t_ take back control? Go Bron!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do they realise that they _can&#8217;t_ take back control? Go Bron!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.bronwenclune.com/2008/04/01/publish2-peddling-old-thinking-as-new-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bronwenclune.com/2008/04/01/publish2-peddling-old-thinking-as-new-journalism/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Yeah, news is rehashed all the time - Associated Press, press releases. So I don&#039;t think journalistic quality is not really a concern of many places.

However, by republishing, you can send one crazy nut case in to Iraq and spread his/her stories across the globe. So in that case, it&#039;s kind of cool.

I think the real problem is that big media focus on what people care about - sport and celebrities. If the Australian culture someday swings to caring about things outside of their privileged lives, perhaps journalistic quality will have no choice but to follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, news is rehashed all the time &#8211; Associated Press, press releases. So I don&#8217;t think journalistic quality is not really a concern of many places.</p>
<p>However, by republishing, you can send one crazy nut case in to Iraq and spread his/her stories across the globe. So in that case, it&#8217;s kind of cool.</p>
<p>I think the real problem is that big media focus on what people care about &#8211; sport and celebrities. If the Australian culture someday swings to caring about things outside of their privileged lives, perhaps journalistic quality will have no choice but to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
